Critics: Seneca Buffalo Hasn’t Delivered

The recession forced the Seneca Nation of Indians to scale back on its casino plans for the city of Buffalo, New York. As a result, say critics, the Buffalo Creek Casino has fallen well short of its promise to bring new tourism to the community.

From 0 million destination to 0 million “shell”

A report by the Buffalo News suggests that the Seneca Nation’s Buffalo Creek Casino has not fully lived up to its promise of economic prosperity in the western New York city.

The casino, which employs 459 workers, has not verified that it is spending $1.7 million per year to market outside the immediate area, which is part of its deal with the city, the News reported, and it seems to be drawing mostly local patrons and those from right across the Canadian border. The casino also has not fulfilled the requirement of an annual marketing presentation for the Common Council.

“The city was made a lot of unrealistic promises. Not surprisingly, those have not been delivered,” said Sam Magavern, co-director of the anti-casino group Partnership for the Public Good. Mayor Byron W. Brown disagrees, and calls the city’s pact with the Senecas “a good deal for Buffalo.”

“While the city continues to monitor the development closely to ensure that the contract terms are satisfied, to date, the Seneca Nation has: constructed a $130 million casino, released $15.5 million in local revenues to the city of Buffalo, invested nearly $4 million in infrastructure improvements around the casino with additional improvements to come, created nearly 500 new jobs and marketed the casino outside of the area,” said Brown spokesman Michael J. DeGeorge in a recent statement. “The city and the Senecas continue to work together to fulfill the agreement’s intent and to maximize the benefits to the city of Buffalo.”

The tribe initially planned to build a $330 million casino hotel in downtown Buffalo. That plan was derailed by the economic downturn, and the Senecas abandoned the original plan in favor of a smaller $130 million complex on the waterfront.

“Smaller is better because it means less gambling is going on,” Magavern said. “But it did reveal that the tourist idea wasn’t a reality.”

Steven H. Siegel, retired professor of hotel, restaurant and tourism management at Niagara University, agrees that a locals market is not generating new income, but recycling existing leisure dollars. “The idea was to attract new money to the area that might financially enrich a wide cross-section of local businesses, not be vacuumed up by slot machines,” Siegel said. “Marketing to locals … brings more profits to the casino from local money that could be spent elsewhere in the local economy.”

The News reports that the Brown administration has not acted to enforce any provision in the agreement, and the casino has not upheld its pledge to retain one-third of its land for green space. Local Council Member David A. Franczyk, who supported the 2006 deal, said the Senecas need to be held accountable. “It’s certainly not Vegas. It’s a basic shell. It’s a middling casino,” he said. “But I wouldn’t come down like the wrath of Khan.”

The tribe’s compact with the state provides for three casinos in western New York. The Senecas obviously want to change the terms of that deal; they recently acquired a tract of land in the town of Henrietta, south of Rochester, with hopes of building a casino there. The plan has met with opposition from the community. Five New York state senators and nine Assembly members have sent a letter to Governor Andrew Cuomo saying they oppose it too.

“We believe that any expansion of gaming opportunities into Western New York will have a devastating impact on existing institutions that contribute millions of dollars to the local economy,” said the senators in their joint letter. The nine members of the state Assembly who signed the letter said they “vehemently” oppose the casino, which would compete with Batavia Downs and Finger Lakes Gaming, components of Western Regional Off-Track Betting.

“There is no question the Western New York region needs additional economic development and jobs. But we don’t need a project like the proposed Seneca Nation casino, which will operate with an unfair competitive advantage and cause the failure of existing local businesses,” the Assembly letter stated.

Michael Nolan, WROTB’s chief operating officer, said Batavia Downs and Finger Lakes create almost 3,000 jobs and generate $54.3 million in annual payroll.

“A Seneca casino, which can undercut other facilities with lower taxes, lower wages, and fewer regulations, is likely to put 2,944 people with good-paying middle-class jobs out of work,” Nolan said. “That is absolutely unacceptable, and the state cannot condone or sanction any action that would allow such an injustice to occur.”