Leagues File Brief in Sports Betting Case; NJ Prepares for Success

The four major professional sports leagues and the NCAA have filed a brief in New Jersey’s U.S. Supreme Court appeal challenging the federal sports-betting ban, as New Jersey prepares for a favorable ruling. U.S. Rep. Frank LoBiondo (l.) and Democrat Rep. Donald Norcross have asked for Congressional hearings on that possibility.

Brief stresses Congress’ power to regulate gambling

With the first arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in New Jersey’s sports-betting challenge only a month away, the four major professional sports leagues—the NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB—and the NCAA have filed their brief with the justices.

The sports leagues filed suit after New Jersey Governor Chris Christie signed a bill into law authorizing state-regulated sports betting for New Jersey casinos. Lower courts ruled the law violated the 1992 federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), which bans sports betting in all but four grandfathered states, of which only Nevada permits full-blown, single-event sports wagering.

New Jersey has appealed those rulings to the high court on the basis that PASPA is itself an unconstitutional violation of states’ rights. The sports leagues’ brief disputes that basic position. “In enacting PASPA, Congress sought to prevent the spread of state-sponsored sports gambling,” the brief states. “Congress’ power to regulate gambling on a nationwide basis is as settled as its power to prohibit states from undertaking or authorizing conduct that conflicts with federal policy.”

The court is slated to begin hearing arguments in the case December 4, with a decision expected by next spring.

Meanwhile, lawmakers representing Atlantic City and the rest of South Jersey are preparing for a Supreme Court win. Last week, South Jersey Republican U.S. Rep. Frank LoBiondo and Democrat Rep. Donald Norcross sent a letter to Rep. Bob Goodlate, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. John Conyers, ranking committee member, requesting the panel begin hearings to prepare the next action, should the U.S. Supreme Court rule for New Jersey or strike down PASPA as an unconstitutional violation of states’ rights.

“We strongly believe the relevant committees should examine the issue prior to the court’s ruling to ensure Congress is fully informed and positioned to quickly respond to the court,” the letter said.

The letter also stressed the same argument that has been made by the American Gaming Association in its campaign to overturn PASPA—that the federal ban has done nothing to curb the popularity of sports betting, but has create a $150 billion illegal market, the profits of which feeds criminal organizations.

“This massive illegal market lacks consumer protections and deprives states and local jurisdictions of revenue that would otherwise stem from a regulated marketplace,” said the letter. “In recognition of PASPA’s failure to prevent illegal sports betting and the benefits of regulations and taxing this activity, numerous states have either enacted or advanced legislative measures to authorize sports betting in recent years.”

AGA President and CEO Geoff Freeman commented in a statement that New Jersey’s efforts to enact sports betting are being repeated across the U.S. “We are seeing a trend towards sports betting in this country,” Freeman said. “Whether it’s the teams that have been placed in Las Vegas or the fact that 14 states have introduced legislation to get out ahead of sports betting, there is a trend here. The time and situation that we are in right now is far different with respect to sports betting.”

New Jersey’s appeal got additional support last week from the Washington, D.C.-based think tank Competitive Enterprise Institute, which announced it is releasing a report authored by Michelle Minton that touches on all the reasons PASPA should be repealed.

According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, the report emphasizes consumer protection from fraud that would exist with regulated sports betting, as well as the argument that PASPA violates the states’ rights provisions 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the equal sovereignty doctrine, in that it allows Nevada a privilege not afforded other states.

“Regardless of how the Supreme Court rules in Christie v. NCAA, Congress should act to repeal PASPA and all other federal gambling laws that threaten the sovereignty of the states and put representative government that is accountable to individual citizens at risk,” Minton told the Review-Journal.

At the recent Global Gaming Expo, AGA’s Freeman predicted that even if the federal sports-betting ban is upheld by the Supreme Court, PASPA’s days are numbered, with hearings expected on bills in the U.S. House and Senate to repeal the ban outright.