The Nebraska Supreme Court will hear oral arguments August 27 over whether the language on a November ballot that would allow wagering on replayed horse races is legal.
“Gambling With the Good Life” has challenged Secretary of State’s John Gale’s decision to let the language and horse racing amendment stand. The organization against gambling in Nebraska filed a petition alleging voters would be deciding two measures with one vote. Executive Director of the organization Pat Loontjer said voters will not have a choice to vote yes on one measure and no on the other, as reported by the Associated Press. The amendment, and its language was approved by the Unicameral earlier this year.
On the ballot, voters are being asked to approve wagering on previously run horse races for the state’s five racetracks. The wagering would take place on video terminals. The amendment also asks voters to funnel revenue from horse racing, both live and replayed, to education, property tax relief and compulsive gambling programs.
Supporters of the amendment are looking to boost live racing and jobs surrounding the industry. Opponents view the video terminals as basically slot machines that will contribute to gambling addiction through losses, and attract younger players. Passing the amendment could also lead to casino proposals for the state. Loontjer said revenue will not lower property taxes.
The Supreme Court must weigh in before September 12, the deadline for the November general election.
Horse racing revenue plunged in Nebraska after casinos were opened in neighboring states.
