Ohio ‘Smurfing’ Law Delayed by Sweepstakes Amendment

Lawmakers in Ohio can’t agree on whether to include an amendment limiting the ownership of sweepstakes games in a bill that would ban a form of money laundering known as “smurfing.”

The Ohio Senate and House are delaying approval of a money-laundering bill because they disagree on an unrelated amendment that deals with internet cafes.

The bill would criminalize so-called “smurfing,” wherein money is laundered in small amounts in casinos. No other state has such a law as yet.

The contentious amendment in question would prevent any business from deriving more than 5 percent of its revenue from sweepstakes games. It was tacked on at the request of law enforcement officials who contend that some owners of internet cafes, which were effectively banned last year, are rebranding themselves and offering so-called “skill games.”

Not all lawmakers favor the amendment and want it removed before they will vote for the smurfing ban.

**GGBNews.com is part of the Clarion Events Group of companies (Clarion). We take your privacy seriously. By registering for this newsletter we wish to use your information on the basis of our legitimate interests to keep in contact with you about other relevant events, products and services which may be of interest to you. We will only ever use the information we collect or receive about you in accordance with our Privacy Policy. You may manage your preferences or unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails.