DraftKings Accused of Marketing to Excluded Gamblers

New Jersey fined DraftKings $10,000 for sending marketing materials to self-excluded gamblers. It wasn’t the first time either. The sportsbook giant promises to do better in the future. Or face more judgments.

DraftKings Accused of Marketing to Excluded Gamblers

In early April NJ Online Gambling said New Jersey fined DraftKings $10,000 for sending marketing material to self-excluded gamblers.

DraftKings blamed the snafu to missing a step in the process. The sportsbook, under the banner of Resorts Casino Hotel, is not permitted to market to folks on the state’s self-exclusion list. In New Jersey, a gambler can self-exclude for a year or a lifetime and anything in between.

A third party company provided 50,000 names for DraftKings to send marketing materials to. But DraftKings had the job of checking the names against the self-exclusion list. The online sportsbook failed.

As a result, literature could have gone out to 11 people on the self-exclusion list. A gambler on the lifetime list told the state DraftKings sent him literature last November. The judgment also required a detailed account on its methodology used to prevent this from happening again.

In March, DraftKings received a $3,000 fine in Indiana for a similar violation. In February, New Jersey again hit DraftKings for $500. The state levied a penalty of $2,000 for letting restricted gamblers bet in 2019, and Iowa issued a judgment of $5,000 for a late download of the self-exclusion list.

For gamblers, the direct marketing material may trigger a relapse.

Measures to keep problem gamblers at bay may improve as the industry matures. DraftKings insists they take the issue seriously.

People who are problem gamblers are not good long-term customers.… It can create a stain on the whole industry, and it’s not in our business interest,” DraftKings CEO and co-founder Jason Robins told the Financial Times in a recent article. Robins said the firm is working to improve safeguards.